Our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy have changed. We think you'll like them better this way.

First Amendment crash course for deprivation of rights

  • Broadcast in Legal



Follow This Show

If you liked this show, you should follow AttorneySteve.

Vondran Legal® Free Speech Law Firm [California | Arizona] Call us at (877) 276-5084.

To prevail in a free speech deprivation case under 42 U.S.C. 1983 in the Ninth Circuit, a plaintiff must typically prove the following elements:

1. The plaintiff was engaged in protected speech or expression.
2. The defendant, acting under the color of state law, deprived the plaintiff of that protected speech.
3. The deprivation of the plaintiff's protected speech was intentional or willful.
4. The deprivation caused an injury or harm to the plaintiff.

Additionally, it is important to note that the Ninth Circuit has adopted a four-part test to analyze whether a government action violates the First Amendment:

1. Is the action capable of chilling protected speech or expression?
2. Does the action in fact chill protected speech?
3. Is the action reasonably related to a legitimate penological or governmental interest?
4. Are there alternative means to exercise the protected speech?

If the plaintiff can establish these elements, they may prevail in their free speech deprivation case under 42 U.S.C. 1983 in the Ninth Circuit. However, it is essential to consult with an attorney to fully understand and navigate the specific legal requirements in a particular case.

For more information visit us at FreeSpeechFirm.com

Facebook comments

Available when logged-in to Facebook and if Targeting Cookies are enabled