C.D. - The Great Debate(s) and The Lady in Red

ASA,

Against my better judgement, I actually watched a good portion of Trump-Clinton I, the Great Debate, perhaps, the most anticipated one, since Kennedy-Nixon and Lincoln-Douglass.

It was clear, that Hillary "LCH" Clinton, dressed in her bright, red pants-suit, was determined to "Shock and Awe", not only her "opponent", but the American public as well.

By accounts, Trump did at times, lose his center, while Hillary did seem more composed, which might be explained by an apparent "implicit bias" on the part of the moderator, liberal commentator, Lester Holt, whose performance overall, I really couldn't criticize, though I understand the concern from the other side.

Some of key points discussed, were Stop-and-Frisk (PROVEN to have saved [black] lives) and Trump's tax returns (note, while it may show that he didn't pay income tax, there's nothing to suggest, he violated any laws, which should be the ONLY concern). By the way, have you read Hillary's? Would you even bother to read Trump's? And, I would say, for him to bring up the purposely deleted (or hidden) emails, was not germaine to the topic at hand. 

And of course, in her thrust to push the woman and race "cards", she dredges up a former Miss Universe, and the charge of "implicit bias", which she crafted as being a problem for "everybody" (yeah, right!). 

On the latter, a U.N. affiliated group has determined that "the history of slavery in the United States justifies reparations for African-Americans". Getting ready for that check?

Congress overwhelming overturned Barack Obama's veto of a Bill, that allows lawsuits against nations, whose citizens have committed terrorist acts against Americans. And this was one of the rare times, Obama had it right. But, notice the silence from Hillary? Why so silent?

FREE college?